by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Governor: The Commonwealth of Ellenburg

WA Delegate: None.

Founder: Endolantron

Last WA Update:

Maps Board Activity History Admin Rank

Largest Publishing Industry: 1,025th Most Rebellious Youth: 1,033rd Most World Assembly Endorsements: 1,235th+22
Most Advanced Public Education: 1,586th Largest Welfare Programs: 1,611th Most Beautiful Environments: 1,654th Most Nations: 1,710th Best Weather: 1,724th Smartest Citizens: 1,751st Lowest Crime Rates: 1,932nd Nicest Citizens: 1,955th Most Valuable International Artwork: 2,111th Highest Economic Output: 2,277th Largest Automobile Manufacturing Sector: 2,336th Most Advanced Public Transport: 2,563rd Most Cultured: 2,615th Most Devout: 2,689th Most Advanced Law Enforcement: 2,789th Largest Black Market: 2,851st Healthiest Citizens: 2,869th Most Accessible: 3,028th Most Authoritarian: 3,126th Most Advanced Defense Forces: 3,182nd Highest Poor Incomes: 3,218th Most Compassionate Citizens: 3,375th
World Factbook Entry

Founded on April 29ᵗʰ, 2005 and peaking between 2007 and 2009, Autropolis remains an active yet quiet region that aims to provide a home among the stars; itself a star cluster orbiting a massive black hole. A plethora of unexplored systems and habitable planets await future settlement.


LinkDISCORD SERVER - We'd appreciate if you used your nation name when you've joined our Discord Server!

LinkModern Forum | History of Autropolis | Embassy Policy


BULLETIN:

⨭ As of 2026-05-01, Autropolis is under new management!
⨭ It has been decided that new nations should be recruited to Autropolis via recruitment telegrams.



  1. 4

    Autropolis - Statement from the Secretary Chancellor

    Bulletin → News by Solariia . 168 reads.

  2. 47

    United Regions Alliance

    Bulletin → Policy by URA Public Affairs . 4,525 reads.

  3. 2

    Embassy Policy [AUT]

    Meta → Gameplay by Echoslavia . 152 reads.

  4. 2

    Chancery of the Government of Autropolis

    Meta → Gameplay by Solariia . 155 reads.

▼ 1 More

Map

This is the map of Autropolis created by Lorium . It has 0 estimated diplomatic weight behind it, the most in Autropolis. It is one of 1 maps of Autropolis.

Embassies: URA, The Forgotten Lands, The Bar on the corner of every region, OmniOne, The Dimensional Rift, The United Caribbean Island Alliance, The Great Experiment, Region Name, The Border Commune, The United Ascendancy, The United Federations, Mariner Trench, Krasnaya, Dawn, Entropy, Venice, and 6 others.The United Empires of Carson, Anteria, Krillin, The United Federation of Planets, Philippines, and Regionless.

Tags: Casual, Democratic, FT: FTL, Featured, Future Tech, Multi-Species, Offsite Chat, Offsite Forums, Outer Space, Regional Government, Small, and World Assembly.

Autropolis contains 10 nations, the 1,710th most in the world.

Today's World Census Report

The Largest Trout Fishing Sector in Autropolis

The World Census conducted frenzied haggling with fishmongers in order to determine which nations have the largest fishing industries.

As a region, Autropolis is ranked 13,974th in the world for Largest Trout Fishing Sector.

NationWA CategoryMotto
1.The Federation of Azell VAutocratic Socialists Hell“We Will Endure”
2.The Alcazar of Kalique AbrasaxAnarchy Lawless Wasteland“Earth is a very small part of a very large industry.”
3.The Unified Empire of Chaos incarceratedPsychotic Dictatorship Communist Dictatorship“Let Chaos Be Your Peace”
4.The Most Serene Republic of Old man of NSAuthoritarian Democracy Slightly Oppressive But A Little Discipline Never Hurt Anyone State“Mission Accomplished”
5.The Holy Empire of Azell IVFather Knows Best State Suspiciously Liberal Dictatorship“Twirling Toward Freedom”
6.The Empire of Rusmo KingdomCorrupt Dictatorship Corrupt Liberal Dictatorship“Unity, Discipline, Work”
7.The Holy Socialist Imperium of New LaudesiaPsychotic Dictatorship Communist Dictatorship“Deus magnus, cervisia bona, homines insaniunt.”
8.The Commonwealth of EllenburgAuthoritarian Democracy Slightly Oppressive But A Little Discipline Never Hurt Anyone State“Cleaning up what other's won't!”
9.The Republic of Azell IIInoffensive Centrist Democracy Communists“Pride and Industry”
10.The Most Serene United Kingdom of BordoriaLeft-wing Utopia Drugged-Out Hippies“Libertas, Iustitia, Fraternitas”

Regional Happenings

More...

Autropolis Regional Message Board

Chaos incarcerated wrote:Its a shame this group was started 21 years ago and is left to 5 nations

C’est la vie.

Still, 21 years is one hell of a run!

Hello, Autropolis friends!

The URA recommends a non-binding vote FOR "Space Transport and Astronomical Research Administration" by a vote of 41.49% FOR, 0.00% AGAINST, and 0.00% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendation:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

Space Transport and Astronomical Research
Forum debate
The General Assembly,

Recognizing the need for international cooperation in outer space, as the shared fabric of the universe that binds all known life, a medium which is becoming increasingly reachable for developing life,

Motivated by a desire to cooperate on preserving access to, and promoting research of, this medium, through international partnership,

Pursuing collaboration on space research and exploration under the framework of national sovereignty, respecting the internal affairs of member nations while promoting cooperation that will prove beneficial to the World Assembly at large,

Hereby defines as follows:

  1. Outer Space: The all-encompassing expanse of vacuum in between celestial objects, including but not limited to stars, planetary bodies, and nebulae.

  2. Spacecraft: A flight-capable vehicle operated within outer space by a civilization.

  3. Civilian Spacecraft: A spacecraft that is owned or operated for non-military use.

Hereby enacts as follows:

  1. The Space Transport and Astronomical Research (STAR) Administration is hereby established with the following directives:

    1. Promoting international research and understanding of outer space, in the interest of uninvasive international cooperation and for the benefit of member nations.

    2. Publishing credible research findings regarding aeronautical travel and outer space phenomena, in cases where such research benefits the international community.

    3. Promoting technology sharing, with consent of any involved parties, to expedite safe, sustainable space travel in developing member nations.

    4. Collaborating with member nations and any further programs established by the General Assembly as needed to minimize internationally relevant risks deriving from spacefaring operations.

  2. Member nations are encouraged to follow any applicable guidelines established by the STAR Administration on the topic of inspecting civilian spacecraft, for the purposes of verifying operational, mechanical, and structural soundness, for the purposes of reducing casualties.

    1. Member nations are encouraged to ensure that their spacecraft can last for the whole mission that they will be used for.

    2. Member nations are encouraged to ensure that their spacecraft undergo extensive structural tests and extensive mechanical tests for the purposes of preventing fuel and chemical leakages, as well as averting other dangerous issues that may arise.

  3. Member nations, when operating in shared terrestrial orbits, are highly encouraged to coordinate with the STAR Administration to the extent needed to avoid, or reduce to the fullest, the risk of unintended collision between spacecraft, satellites, and other structures.

    1. For the purpose of resolving emergency situations, member nations are encouraged to share communication channels and contact procedures for civilian spacecraft operating in the same terrestrial orbits.

  4. The STAR Administration shall respect the sovereignty of all member states regarding exploration, studying, and missions into outer space.

    1. The STAR Administration shall have zero authority to pass discipline onto nations.

Co-authors: Centennium, New Ryansville

World Census Analysis
W I N N E R S
▲Industry: Book Publishing▲Intelligence▲Scientific Advancement
L O S E R S
▼Ignorance▼Primitiveness▼Averageness

World Census analysis assumes a typical nation. Individual results may vary.


This General Assembly resolution was authored by Alainian Otters and aims to protect the free exploration of space by member states.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote FOR this resolution

This resolution creates the Space Transport and Astronomical Research Administration, tasked with fostering an informed and collaborative environment within the outer space research community. The resolution goes on to encourage, in various fields, cooperation both among member states and between member states and the Space Transport and Astronomical Research Administration, such as inspections and emergency communications. The URA supports the protection of our common outer space environment, and thus urges a vote FOR this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:I mean, I guess? It's incredibly soft though, the only concrete action actually taken is the publication of reports and collaborating to reduce risk. Support.

Zorgazia wrote:Its a fairly good bill
It's not too overreaching and doesn't force any nation to do it's bidding

Also some clauses are realistic and in my professional opinion it could have been written even better but for now I support this current one ✅



Internal voting results

Turnout: 4/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 41.49%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch

Hello, Autropolis friends!

The URA recommends a non-binding vote FOR "Repeal: “Liberate Utopia”" by a vote of 20.84% FOR, 0.00% AGAINST, and 15.98% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendation:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

Repeal: “Liberate Utopia”
Forum debate
Security Council Resolution #13 “Liberate Utopia” shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The Security Council,

Acknowledging that “Liberate Utopia” served an essential purpose in helping Utopia’s residents reclaim their region from rogues, at a time when the region lacked the means to do so itself, restoring Utopia’s idyllic and positive environment,

Noting that the specific security concerns and administrative disruptions that prompted SC#13 to be written have been fully resolved by the region’s current residents and global circumstances,

Observing that no native population of Utopia remains, its founding nations and long-standing residents before its refounding having long since ceased to exist, leaving only recently arrived nations with no historical claim to the region predating this Council’s original intervention,

Recognizing that the Security Council’s resolutions are meant to uphold durable principles rather than preserve dated concerns and grievances,

Reflecting that the vulnerability following the loss of Utopia’s founder, Utopian Thoughts, left the region genuinely exposed, and SC#13’s intervention played a real part in seeing it through that period,

Further reflecting that the circumstances behind the one-time occurrence belong to a specific chapter in Utopia’s history that has since closed,

Noting further that the residents of Utopia took matters into their own hands, refounding the region and entrusting it in their own community,

Aware that Utopia, like any other founderless region, can rely on established defender coalitions to defend itself, coordinated through networks such as Libcord, which monitor and respond to raids regardless of formal treaty ties or Security Council resolutions,

Understanding that this Council repeals liberation resolutions once a region has shown long-term stability and no longer requires active World Assembly intervention, as with the recent repeal of “Liberate Portugal de Esquerda,” where the resolution was recognized as unable to serve its intended function without a governor to enforce it, leaving the text ineffective without any active protective effort, and as with the repeal of “Liberate Syria,” where invading forces were found to no longer pose a threat to the region, as they were long gone,

Exhausted that “Liberate Utopia” has stood 17 years past the events that needed it, far longer than its original purpose,

Hereby repeals “Liberate Utopia”.

Co-author: Varanius

This Security Council resolution was authored by L V M H and aims to repeal SCR#13, Liberate Utopia.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote FOR this resolution

This resolution seeks to repeal SCR#13, which liberated Utopia following its occupation by hostile forces. However, those forces have since been overthrown, and the natives of the region are now free to self-organise their own defence. The URA supports this restoration of local governance, and thus urges a vote FOR this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:On the proposal itself, Unibot repeal, support.



Internal voting results


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch

Hello, Autropolis friends!

The URA recommends a non-binding vote FOR "International Nuclear Compliance Commission" by a vote of 25.81% FOR, 0% AGAINST, and 0% ABSTAIN.

The URA also recommends a non-binding vote FOR "Repeal: “Commend Vilita and Turori”" by a vote of 25.81% FOR, 0.00% AGAINST, and 16.21% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendations:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

International Nuclear Compliance Commission
Forum debate
The World Assembly,

Understanding the certain risks and dangers relating to nuclear energy generation,

Recognizing the effort and expertise required to maintain nuclear energy infrastructure, and the investments required to fuse and split the atom,

Concerned about the potential mismanagement, misunderstanding, and misuse of nuclear power,

Aiming to establish a concrete, just, and fair governing body to oversee and regulate safe nuclear generation efforts in member nations, establishes the following:

  1. For clarity, defines:

    1. “Nuclear Energy”, for this resolution only, as any type of commercial or national power infrastructure, consisting of more than one structure, which uses energy from the interactions of an atomic nucleus with another subatomic particle or nuclei, and propagating any form of radiation or danger of nuclear contamination;

    2. “Criticality”, as any nuclear chain reaction that is self-sustaining, where each splitting atom releases enough neutrons to maintain a chain reaction under the control of Reactor Operators, in terms of Nuclear Fission;

    3. “SCRAM”, as any emergency shutdown or automatic safety system in any nuclear energy, that forces the nuclear reaction to slow to a significant degree, or stop;

  2. The International Nuclear Compliance Commission (INCC) is established and funded as the World Assembly organization with the chief end of regulating and ensuring the safe use of Nuclear Energy. INCC shall then be responsible for the following duties:

    1. INCC shall publish and maintain an extensive list of safeguards, rules, regulations, and precautions that World Assembly members will subscribe to, defining the safe use and operations of Nuclear Energy, with revisions as needed;

    2. For member nations with no Nuclear infrastructure, the INCC will oversee any attempts to achieve criticality, and provide reasonable assistance when needed or requested by any member;

    3. Audit and ensure the compliance of member nations’ nuclear energy infrastructure, verifying that all operations are up to INCC standards; however, any facility inspections shall require the full voluntary consent of host nations;

    4. Maintain a safe clause of security around nuclear power, and educate and inform those nations wanting to learn more about the atom, its uses, and the boons of nuclear energy;

  3. INCC shall, under good rapport and audit, establish, affirm, and administer the following non-autonomous organizations:

    1. The Advisory Committee on Reactor Safety (ACRS), to advise the Commission, concerning national law, the hazards of proposed or existing reactor facilities in member nations, and to establish a safe working environment and sound SCRAM systems;

    2. The Emergency Nuclear Response Organization (ENRO), to coordinate response time, emergency efforts, and flow of information in the time of a nuclear disaster, with report to the INCC, and to assist with humanitarian organizations and national emergency response to convey prudent information on the disaster;

Declares the atom a safe, now regulated, source of energy.

World Census Analysis
W I N N E R S
▲Foreign Aid▲Intelligence▲Taxation
L O S E R S
▼Ignorance▼Primitiveness▼Industry: Gambling

World Census analysis assumes a typical nation. Individual results may vary.


This General Assembly resolution was authored by Maerkyja and aims to regulate and make safe electricity generation by nuclear fission.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote FOR this resolution

This resolution creates the International Nuclear Compliance Commission, tasked with overseeing, regulating, and auditing nuclear energy and facilities thereof. The resolution goes on to create subsidiary organs of the International Nuclear Compliance Commission, with more narrow focuses on specific aspects of nuclear energy safety, such as emergency response. The URA supports the safe generation of energy, and thus urges a vote FOR this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:Fusion is oddly absent, but I like this proposal. Support.

Lycos wrote:This proposal is pretty toothless save for creating an international bureaucracy for the sake of creating an international bureaucracy. It is not a well researched proposal and the author has refused reasonable feedback. For these, and other reasons I am privy to, opposed wholly.



Internal voting results


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch



URA World Assembly Recommendation

Repeal: “Commend Vilita and Turori”
Forum debate
Security Council Resolution #309 “Commend Vilita and Turori” shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The Security Council,

Recalling the passage of Commend Vilita and Turori in May 2020, which sought to commend the nation for its awe-inspiring successes and extraordinary contributions to the international sports community,

Questioning the merits of that resolution in light of an investigation conducted three years thereafter that exposed Vilita for a litany of grave and reprehensible transgressions committed against that community,

Observing that Vilita’s efforts to foster “a welcoming environment” are enervated by the revelation that they themselves engaged in a behaviour that was both unbecoming of a nation considered a pillar of the international sports community and one commended by this august body:

  • Vilita sent the puppet nations of United, Racing, and Esportiva to terrorize Esportiva's regional message board. Vilita and any other nations under its control would wind up being proscribed from ever setting foot on Esportiva.

  • Esportiva’s plight was not an isolated incident, as Vilita employed the same tactics under the nation of Pirahna to target The Western Isles.

Repulsed by how Vilita founded two nations which misled the community into believing other prolific nations were engaged in illegal puppetry, causing lasting damage to these nations’ credibility until evidence of their innocence came to light after the investigations:

  • East Neutralia, signed up for two editions of the Copa Rushmori (Editions XXX and XXXVIII), had a flag bearing resemblance to that of Rushmore resident Oberour Ar Moro.

  • New old Forest, who had signed up for the Di Bradini Cup 50 immediately after its founding, was widely assumed to be an undeclared puppet of TJUN-ia.

Appalled that Vilita’s criminality does not end there, as Vilita’s worst offenses came in the form of trying to circumvent community regulations by surreptitiously sneaking puppets into multiple competitions undeclared, most notably:

  • In World Cup 19 (WC19), Vilita entered 11 undeclared puppets, including Crystilakere, which would go on to win WC19. Throughout the entire tournament, Vilitan sporting officials refereed each of the would-be victor’s matches.

  • In World Cup 22 (WC22), Vilita entered 9 undeclared puppets, including Oaker, which finished second. Vilitan sporting officials refereed every one of Oaker’s matches except the final.

  • In World Cup 95 (WC95), both of the aforementioned puppets’ appearances were declared null and void: Crystilakere’s title was declared vacated; Oaker’s final appearance met the same fate.

  • In World Cups 13 through 27, Vilita would enter 16 other undeclared nations into the competition.

Acknowledging that being granted assent to host a sporting competition anywhere across the multiverse is an honour conferred to those who have earned the trust of the wider sports community,

Saddened that Vilita had, prior to being exposed, been considered a role model to many up-and-coming nations seeking to summit the mountaintop of sporting glory, and that said aspirants sought to model themselves after Vilita,

Noting the subsequent outcry in reaction to Vilita’s shocking misdeeds, culminating in not only its shunning but its expulsion from the Executive World Cup Committee (EWCC) and World Cup Committee (WCC),

Therefore lamenting Vilita’s fall from grace, as the revelations of their duplicity and misconduct were not only antithetical to what was expected of such an applauded and revered nation, but also broke the hearts of an overwrought international sports community awash in a flood of unthinkable grief, incredulity, and indignation,

Laying bare the many repugnant and shameful actions committed by Vilita that are utterly antipodean to the noble virtues embodied by other nations enshrined in the pantheon of those commended by the Security Council,

HEREBY repeals “Commend Vilita and Turori.”

Co-author: Giovanniland

This Security Council resolution was authored by Isenoka and aims to repeal SCR#309, Commend Vilita and Turori.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote FOR this resolution

This resolution seeks to repeal SCR#309, which commended Vilita and Turori on the grounds of its extensive record with both creating and winning international sporting competitions. However, since that commendation matters have come to light which expose a deep and duplicitous campaign of subterfuge by the commendee, including the disruption of multiple regions and a significant effort to introduce false nations to World Cups. The URA is aghast at this level of foul play, and thus urges a vote FOR this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:NS Sports (the relevant community) seems to be generally in favour, so support.



Internal voting results

Turnout: 4/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 42.02%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch

Hello, Autropolis friends!

The URA recommends a non-binding vote FOR "Missing Persons Coordination Act" by a vote of 25.68% FOR, 0.00% AGAINST, and 0.00% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendation:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

Missing Persons Coordination Act
Forum debate
The World Assembly,

Recognizing that uncountable amounts of individuals disappear each year due to armed conflict, natural disasters, hazards encountered during migration, crime, and other circumstances,

Alarmed that widespread or systematic disappearances may indicate ethnic cleansing, genocide, crimes against humanity, or other large-scale violations of individual rights,

Concerned that gaps in national investigative procedures and recordkeeping can allow disappearances to go unrecognized as part of broader patterns, particularly when authorities lack the means or willingness to investigate them,

Acknowledging that the timely collection and exchange of information concerning missing persons can assist in locating individuals, identifying unidentified remains, and detecting evidence of mass crimes,

Affirming that accurate records concerning missing persons may assist in preventing the concealment, denial, or repetition of large-scale atrocities,

Hereby:

  1. Defines a "missing person" as an individual whose whereabouts are unknown and whose disappearance has been reported or otherwise brought to the attention of a government or non-governmental organization with a humanitarian or security mission,

  2. Requires member states to maintain records of reported missing persons, including,

    1. identifying information,

    2. the circumstances and approximate date and location of the disappearance,

    3. any information relevant to determining whether the disappearance may be connected to armed conflict, persecution, forced displacement, or other large-scale violence,

    4. updates regarding the status of the investigation,

    5. a readily accessible method for individuals to request the correction or removal of inaccurate information,

  3. Mandates member states to establish procedures for identifying unusual patterns or substantial increases in reported disappearances, particularly where such disappearances:

    1. are concentrated within a particular geographic area,

    2. appear to disproportionately affect a particular ethnic, religious, cultural, national, gender identity or other identifiable characteristic,

    3. occur alongside armed conflict, forced displacement, mass violence, or systematic persecution,

  4. Encourages member states to establish procedures for sharing relevant identifying information, including fingerprints, medical records, photographs, and DNA profiles when:

    1. the information has been lawfully collected,

    2. appropriate safeguards exist to protect personal privacy,

    3. the exchange is reasonably necessary to locate missing persons, identify unidentified remains, or investigate possible mass atrocities,

  5. Calls upon member states to inform the relatives of a missing person when:

    1. the missing person is located,

    2. the missing person's remains are positively identified,

    3. authorities determine that the case has been conclusively resolved,

  6. Urges member states to establish procedures allowing relatives of missing persons to submit relevant information to competent authorities and request information concerning the status of an investigation, subject to applicable privacy and security protections,

  7. Recommends that member states in which a missing person is located establish procedures for ensuring the person's safe and secure transfer to their country of nationality or residence, where appropriate and with the consent of the individual, including through cooperation with relevant authorities and humanitarian organizations,

  8. Promotes cooperation between member states in locating missing persons and identifying unidentified remains, including through the exchange of relevant information and assistance with cross-border investigations,

  9. Clarifies that nothing in this resolution shall:

    1. require member states to disclose classified information,

    2. require member states to initiate an investigation in every case involving a reported missing person,

    3. require the collection or exchange of information unrelated to the purposes of this resolution.

Co-author: Fhaengshia

World Census Analysis
W I N N E R S
▲Safety▲Law Enforcement▲Tourism
L O S E R S
▼Political Apathy▼Average Disposable Income

World Census analysis assumes a typical nation. Individual results may vary.


This General Assembly resolution was authored by Northern Slatavia and aims to integrate member state systems for rescuing missing persons.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote FOR this resolution

This resolution establishes various requirements for member states to follow, including the recording of relevant data on missing persons cases and the creation of procedures to handle likely cases of organised abductions. The resolution goes on to facilitate the sharing of relevant data between member states, and collaboration between member states where such would be beneficial to the closing of missing persons cases. The URA supports these measures, and thus urges a vote FOR this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:Pretty good. Would prefer if there was more mandatory elements, but something is better than nothing. Support.



Internal voting results


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch

Hello, Autropolis friends!

The URA recommends a non-binding vote AGAINST "Disability Assistance Law" by a vote of 0% FOR, 26.56% AGAINST, and 16.20% ABSTAIN.

The URA also recommends a non-binding vote FOR "Repeal: “Liberate Empires Forever United”" by a vote of 38.22% FOR, 0.00% AGAINST, and 4.53% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendations:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

Disability Assistance Law
Forum debate
The World Assembly,

Recognizing that there are only a few supportive measures for people with disabilities or neurodivergence,

Expressing dissatisfaction with the lack of assistance for such individuals,

At the same time, trusting that a regulation of this kind could resolve the issue, the World Assembly enacts legislation to support persons with disabilities and those who are neurodivergent.

1) Applicability of the law on means of transport, at stops, and in everyday commuting:
-1/a) Low-floor boarding and alighting areas at stops and on vehicles, elevators, automatic doors and ramps.
-1/b) Installation of tactile paving for the visually impaired on kerbs and vehicles, installing Braille writing on every important subtitle.
-1/c) Installation of devices at crossings that assist both the visually and hearing impaired via sound signals.

2) Applicability of the law on helps of people with neurodivergence:
-2/a) Designing quiet, calm, and uncluttered stores for autistic individuals, or at least introducing "quiet hours" into opening times.
-2/b) Designing schools for neurodivergent students where their needs are met to facilitate learning.
-2/c) Developing supportive education for students with dyslexia, dysgraphia, and dyscalculia.
-2/d) Creating less rigid, more active lessons for students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
-2/e) Giving every neurodivergent student whatever they need to start a succesful life, where they're not rejected by the community.

3) Applicability of the law on online platforms:
-3/a) Optimizing websites and applications for screen reader software, such as sign language interpretation or text descriptions of images.
-3/b) Creating websites that allow users to switch to a dyslexia-friendly font at the touch of a button. Providing electronic, dictation-based, and predictive text input options instead of handwriting on official forms. Visually presenting numerical data.
-3/c) Creating clean websites free of advertisements and flashing elements, websites that don't cause sensoric overload.
-3/d) Use of simple, easy-to-understand language in documents; simple wording for invoices and informational materials.
-3/e) Enabling personalized administration service by providing—in addition to telephone support—chat options and scheduled, no-wait appointments.

World Census Analysis
W I N N E R S
▲Accessibility▲Income Equality▲Public Education
L O S E R S
▼Averageness▼Economy▼Rudeness

World Census analysis assumes a typical nation. Individual results may vary.


This General Assembly resolution was authored by Pax Russica and aims to establish various regulations to accommodate disabled persons in certain areas of society.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote AGAINST this resolution

This resolution establishes three spheres within which disability accommodations are to be made: transportation, education, and the internet. The resolution goes on to describe the specific accommodations to be made within each sphere, linked to specific disabilities. The URA, however, believes that such specificity is unhelpful to the cause of supporting disabled persons within the great variety of member states, and combined with the poor quality of the resolution and failure by the author to take or facilitate public comment, this resolution is greatly flawed, and thus urges a vote AGAINST this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:Genuinely the worst formatting I've ever seen in an at-vote, incredibly specific cases of disability that aren't applicable across the NS multiverse, and also just an overly specific, limited list of solutions. Against.



Internal voting results

Turnout: 4/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 42.76%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch



URA World Assembly Recommendation

Repeal: “Liberate Utopia”
Forum debate
Security Council Resolution #523 “Liberate Empires Forever United” shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The Security Council,

Acknowledging the malevolent forces which attempted the destruction of Empires Forever United, hereafter referred to as EFU,

Celebrating the efforts of defenders who passed SC#523 to ensure EFU would not fall into the control of Invaders,

Noting that on the 13th of September 2026, EFU successfully transitioned into a stronghold after two years of insecurity as the region danced between native and foreign control,

Recognizing that the remaining natives of EFU do not see their resolution as a source of pride but redundancy following the transition,

Believing that the resolution has become obsolete and serves no functional purpose to the region in any meaningful capacity,

Hereby Repeals SC#523 "Liberate Empires Forever United".

Co-authors: Moduland, Northern Slatavia

This Security Council resolution was authored by Forsakened Acheron and aims to repeal SCR#523, Liberate Empires Forever United.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote FOR this resolution

This resolution seeks to repeal SCR#523, which liberated Empires Forever United following its occupation by hostile forces. However, those forces have since been overthrown, and the natives of the region have been restored to self-governance. The present government sees the liberation as unnecessary, and has clearly approved this resolution. The URA supports this restoration of local governance, and thus urges a vote FOR this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:A bit short, but the natives like it. Support.



Internal voting results

Turnout: 4/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 42.75%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch

Hello, Autropolis friends!

The URA recommends a non-binding vote FOR "Repeal: “International Agricultural Biodiversity Safeguard”" by a vote of 34.65% FOR, 0.00% AGAINST, and 8.59% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendation:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

Repeal: “International Agricultural Biodiversity Safeguard”
Forum debate
General Assembly Resolution #11 “International Agricultural Biodiversity Safeguard” shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Beyond merely striking resolutions from the floor, repeals serve as snapshots of the World Assembly’s outlook. This is because they are themselves expressions of the Assembly's collective will and provide insight into the evolving standards by which the Assembly evaluates resolutions and offer a window into its very culture.

We, the reborn General Assembly, have collectively embraced our role in forging a new culture, one that centers an inclusive vision of sovereignty and progress. We have passed resolutions establishing foundational infrastructure and unifying principles, to act as a catalyst for the Assembly’s future.

We must also embrace the potential of repeals in this new era, not as instruments of destruction, but of progress. We have the responsibility of establishing a new forward-looking repeal custom: one that advances the theoretical foundations underpinning the Assembly and ensures that the practical implementation of those foundations remains strong.

As such, the General Assembly finds the following regarding GA#11’s animating principles:

  1. It's vital that this body's resolutions tackle issues of international import, and international agricultural preservation is certainly one such topic. The goal of enjoining members to collaborate in safeguarding the world's food supply is laudable.

  2. It is essential that this body’s resolutions respect the sovereignty and interests of members, particularly vulnerable ones. The target makes a good-faith effort to align with that and to protect such states. Its preamble takes care to express concern regarding "vulnerability to disease, pests, and continued changes to the environment."

However, while this animus indicates strong potential, resolutions must take care to execute their provisions well. In that regard, the General Assembly finds the following:

  1. Section 2 requires the ISPI (the WA agency established by the target for seed preservation and access) to "[develop] redundant storage systems across multiple geographic regions." It does not set further parameters for their establishment, leaving the uncomfortable possibility of undue encroachment into the jurisdiction of members. It also provides no obvious pathway for collaboration by members interested in hosting or accommodating such sites.

  2. Clause 4 "[affirms] that all contributed genetic material remains the sovereign property of the originating nation." It's unclear what "sovereign property" means, what the limits of "genetic material" are, or what protections that entails in practice. This could compromise the agency's operations and members reliant on its assistance in times of great vulnerability.

  3. Clause 7 "[authorizes] the ISPI to distribute preserved seeds at no cost to nations experiencing agricultural collapse due to disaster, conflict, or environmental crisis." The ISPI does not actually need a request or even consent from members to distribute seeds to them that they might not need or possess the infrastructure to utilize. The stipulation that distribution "respects regional agricultural practices and ecological compatibility" does not ameliorate this.

Overall, the target's issues are ones of unevenness stemming from a lack of refinement. It attempts to undertake a worthwhile, globally relevant policy objective in ways that benefit members and respect their interests. However, this policymaking must be handled with greater robustness than the target demonstrates. As it stands, the target's important clauses are harmfully underdeveloped.

These findings should provide a roadmap for future efforts, both in revisiting this subject matter and in beginning to build a new culture of repeals. There is no better target to use in fashioning such a tradition than one that, while poorly executed, demonstrates clear potential for addressing a matter undoubtedly suitable for Assembly lawmaking. After all, the shape of the seed informs the shape of the tree.

Co-authors: Cretox State, Merethin, Bjornifjordaland

World Census Analysis
No statistical effect.

This General Assembly resolution was authored by Mar Teret and aims to repeal GAR#11, International Agricultural Biodiversity Safeguard.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote FOR this resolution

This resolution seeks to repeal GAR#11, legislation originally intended to establish a seed bank from which agricultural samples may be distributed in case of emergency. As pointed out in the repeal, however, the original resolution is insufficiently precise regarding control over donated materials, and the International Seed Preservation Initiative is unnecessarily mandated to perform tasks which may, in some cases, produce detrimental results. The URA believes that these harms caused by the resolution's flaws outweigh its benefits in preserving international agriculture. Given these arguments, the URA urges a vote FOR this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:Mixed, like the OR. Still, replacement on the way, so it can't be too bad. Weak support.



Internal voting results

Turnout: 4/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 43.24%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch

Hello, Autropolis friends!

The URA recommends a non-binding vote FOR "End Capital Punishment" by a vote of 22.91% FOR, 0.00% AGAINST, and 16.17% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendation:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

End Capital Punishment
Forum debate
No person may be killed or seriously injured as punishment under law.

World Census Analysis
W I N N E R S
▲Civil Rights▲Niceness▲Compassion
L O S E R S
▼Social Conservatism▼Authoritarianism
P O L I C I E S   C A N C E L L E D
Capital Punishment

World Census analysis assumes a typical nation. Individual results may vary.


This General Assembly resolution was authored by Tinhampton and aims to prohibit the death penalty.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote FOR this resolution

This resolution is extremely short, and simply bans any death or major injury as a legal penalty. Given the simplicity of the single-sentence resolution and its thusly derived clarity, the URA urges a vote FOR this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:On the proposal, morally good, support.

Lycos wrote:This proposal is too vague to be effective. It was drsfted for five years and this is what the author landed on. Opposed.



Internal voting results


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch

Hello, Autropolis friends!

The URA recommends a non-binding vote AGAINST "Convention on International Arbitration" by a vote of 0.00% FOR, 27.58% AGAINST, and 16.06% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendation:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

Convention on International Arbitration
Forum debate
The World Assembly,

Reflecting throughout the course of history, instances of grave crimes, injustices, and violations of basic rights have occurred;

Believing that the establishment of an international body based on collective action and shared sentiments of justice can ameliorate or prevent the repetition of such actions;

Upholding that the rulings of such a forum will respect the rights, governments, liberties, and domestic policy choices of all members not explicitly ceded to this body;

This body establishes that:

  1. Definitions

    1. A "Breach of International Conduct" is behavior consisting of one or more of the following actions:

      1. Actions that violate protections or statutes defined in international law.

      2. Actions where nation(s) or people(s) egregiously infringes on the sovereignty and basic rights of other nation(s) or people(s).

    2. An "Impossible Amelioration of Justice" is a condition where there is a credible lack of infrastructure, intent, or due process to deliver reasonably swift and commensurate justice to plaintiffs subjected to perceived extraordinary damages and/or Breach of International Conduct.

  2. The Commission

    1. The Commission to Organize Universal Rights and Treatment (hereafter COURT) shall be established as a forum to listen and bring reconciliation to events meeting the standards in II.2.

    2. The COURT shall only arbitrate on instances of a Breach of International Conduct or where there is an Impossible Amelioration of Justice. Whether such an event meets these standards shall be agreed upon during the hearing by the COURT and one or more involved parties and based on sufficient and reasonable evidence:

      1. Contained in relevant World Assembly resolution(s), when applicable or available,

      2. that the relevant national courts or involved parties are unable, obstructing, or hindering justice,

      3. and that commensurate truth and reconciliation cannot be carried out at a private or national level.

    3. Member states or victims of a Breach of International Conduct or Impossible Amelioration of Justice may bring cases before the COURT as plaintiffs, or the COURT itself may choose to take up cases by direct petition.

    4. Should General Assembly legislation change policies in a way that contradicts past recommendations, plaintiffs, victims, or those accused by the latter may ask the COURT for reassessment of decisions and/or have the case re-heard.

  3. Procedure

    1. The COURT shall define its own procedures, conduct of participants, and case management systems.

    2. Upon submission of a case, a hearing will determine if the case meets the Standards in II. If it meets the standards, the involved member states shall determine consent to the hearing's outcome and to participating in the arbitration process. If it’s reasonably deemed that I.1. and I.2. have occurred, the COURT may investigate and arbitrate to the best of its ability with a majority vote.

  4. Arbitration & Enactment

    1. The COURT shall issue public decisions, based on the facts of the case, which may entail reconciliation, sanctions, reforms, and collective actions for the international community, and coordinate with them to ensure their enactment. These must respect the sovereignty and reserved powers prescribed by the General Assembly, while still delivering appropriate justice.

    2. Member states consenting to arbitration agree to coordinate to adopt, implement, enforce, and abide by the COURT and its arbitrations through individual political, diplomatic, economic, legal, or law enforcement measures.

    3. Member states who refuse to abide by decisions of the COURT or accept arbitration must submit their reasoning to the public. Other member states are encouraged to assist with the COURT's investigations, and enact sanctions and other geopolitical measures in response.

Co-authors: MLGDogeland, Gudetama

World Census Analysis
W I N N E R S
▲Safety▲Inclusiveness▲Accessibility
L O S E R S
▼Political Apathy▼Social Conservatism▼Industry: Gambling

World Census analysis assumes a typical nation. Individual results may vary.


This General Assembly resolution was authored by Ubertas and aims to establish an international reconciliatory forum.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote AGAINST this resolution

This resolution establishes the Commission to Organize Universal Rights and Treatment to intervene in breaches of international law, national sovereignty, human rights, and unawarded justice. The resolution goes on to lay out the circumstances under which the Commission to Organize Universal Rights and Treatment may act, as well as the actions it may take to resolve its cases. The URA, however, believes that the Commission to Organize Universal Rights and Treatment overbears upon other organs of the General Assembly, while being excessively restricted in its portfolio of actions and contradictory in its inciting incidents, and thus urges a vote AGAINST this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:'A "Breach of International Conduct" is behavior consisting of one or more of the following actions:

Actions that violate protections or statutes defined in international law.'
So COURT is to be the universal enforcer of all WA resolutions? Stepping on the toes of the agencies established in those resolutions? Against.

Zorgazia wrote:Against
This causes conflict between organisations established through WA bills, no support from me

Battadia wrote:Just noticed that III.2 "reasonably deemed that I.1. and I.2. have occurred" (emphasis added) contradicts II.2 "arbitrate on instances of a Breach of International Conduct or where there is an Impossible Amelioration of Justice" (emphasis again added).



Internal voting results

Turnout: 4/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 43.94%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch

Hello, Autropolis friends!

The URA recommends a non-binding vote AGAINST "Repeal: “Liberate Democratia”" by a vote of 0.00% FOR, 22.52% AGAINST, and 20.78% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendation:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

Repeal: “Liberate Democratia”
Forum debate
Security Council Resolution #11 “Liberate Democratia” shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The Security Council,

Recognizing SC#11 “Liberate Democratia” as this body’s fourth ever liberation of a region, with the stated intent of rescuing it from invasion,

Finding that the region has long been rendered entirely inactive, without much hope for a revival of its old community,

Concluding that without a native community to protect, the liberation’s original purpose of protecting those natives has been rendered obsolete,

Noting that regional governor Fire Eaters has frequently ceased to exist in the past, thereby leaving the region defenceless against invasion,

Asserting that despite this potential vulnerability, thousands of other regions consistently lack an executive governor to ensure regional security without being at any noteworthy risk of occupation,

Understanding that Democratia itself has not seen even trivial forms of raiding in years, and lacks any outstanding characteristics that may lead to it becoming a particularly enticing target in the future,

Affirming that liberations exist to meet exigent or continuing circumstances that warrant them, and

Disappointed that this resolution fails to differentiate itself whatsoever from the nearly identical SC#4 “Liberate Belgium,”

Hereby repeals Security Council Resolution 11 “Liberate Democratia.”

Co-authors: Inevitable Poverty, New Illyricum

This Security Council resolution was authored by Islandwalk and aims to repeal SCR#11, Liberate Democratia.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote AGAINST this resolution

This resolution seeks to repeal SCR#11, which liberated Democratia following its occupation by hostile forces. The resolution argues that those forces have long been overthrown, and that the original resolution was significantly plagiarised from SC#4. However, the present occupants of the region are opposed to the resolution, which the URA does not consider superior to the stain of plagiarism, and thus urges a vote AGAINST this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:A rather complex one; one side says the natives don't want the repeal, the other side says the OR being plagiarised is more important than fake natives.
Against.



Internal voting results

Turnout: 4/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 43.30%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch

Forum View

Advertisement