ForestBoard

Communist Beijing Must be China wrote:

It was good while it lasted, ey?

Sayonara, Down Scoblic and Prusmia.

Aw man...
Now where will I nap?

Communist Beijing Must be China wrote:

It was good while it lasted, ey?

Sayonara, Down Scoblic and Prusmia.

*sniff yes...*
they don't like people from other regions
and they don't like one liners though

I already said goodbye to the embassy.

So I'm saying goodbye again.

Goodbye lush Forest!

I hope you embassy was closed

thank for passed (jk why not?).

Well, I have to say this. Goodbye Forest. It was fun while it lasted. Thanks for to ur time being a embassy and now it's closing for good.

Double post! Well see you guys sometime in the future!

never understood the vanity of people making a big deal of their comings and goings.

(but then i don't claim to entirely understand the petty collective narcissism of humanity as a species either)

Mondstadtes KaiseReich wrote:

I will regret this. Welp no more Prusmian chat'n'talk on the TNP RMB then...

Not entirely true. I'll still be hanging around your RMB to maintain stuff there; it'll just be on a puppet account.

Well, I will just create my Forest nation to go to the region of Forest and I will be talking to Forest residents. This is my last time chatting with Foresters.

I just created my Forest version of me and I joined the region to communicate to you all in the times when Forest is closing the North Pacific embassy.

Forest Virginia wrote:

I think Window Land's point was that if you are holding a firearm, you have an ethical and moral obligation to understand that you hold life and death in your hands. You must understand that you have the power to kill in your hands whether it be intentional or not. As a result you should NEVER point a firearm at anything you are not willing to gravely injure or kill. Basically, be a responsible gun owner.

There is never any situation in life where you are morally justified for killing or injuring another person. To say you should never point a firearm at anything you aren't willing to kill fundamentally misunderstands the point of responsible gun ownership. You should just never point a firearm at a human being. That's what being a responsible gun owner means.

Here in Australia, if you get a firearms licence, you have to participate in a minimum number of competition shoots every year (unless you're a farmer with a certain size block of land, because then you may need it for the purpose of culling wildlife and so on). There's very few other reasons that you can give for owning a firearm, and none of them are "self-defence", because that's not legally justifiable. And it shouldn't be, because in any civilised society, killing in any context, let alone self-defence, isn't morally justifiable.

Forest Virginia wrote:

I think Window Land's point was that if you are holding a firearm, you have an ethical and moral obligation to understand that you hold life and death in your hands. You must understand that you have the power to kill in your hands whether it be intentional or not. As a result you should NEVER point a firearm at anything you are not willing to gravely injure or kill. Basically, be a responsible gun owner.

Yeap, that's a basic rule with guns and a good one. I was thinking the context must be that but also that it's not always about killing the target, even when it's always basically a possibility.