SolarFlareBoard

Tocan isle wrote:

Wait where does it say this?

in an article i read a few days ago

Gruffyrichard and hillbillybob wrote:

in an article i read a few days ago

Although i don’t think that CW should have suppressed posts, what CW did does not break any SolarFlare rules, nor does it break any NS rules or anything like that. It’s her region and she can suppress whatever posts she wants

Gruffyrichard and hillbillybob wrote:

technically no
but still its unreasonable suppression of free speech

Yeah, it is, and as I said, I don’t necessarily agree with her suppression of the messages

All i can think about rn is "Wait til Celestial wave sees this"

Tocan isle wrote:

All I have to say is, while I don’t really agree with what CW did, it is completely within her rights to do that because it is her region

technically

Gruffyrichard and hillbillybob wrote:

All i can think about rn is "Wait til Celestial wave sees this"

*Cough cough*

Who will be the judge

Tocan isle wrote:

IN THE COURT OF SOLARFLARE
The issue on the table: according to the official laws of Solarflare, did Celestial wave commit a crime by suppressing two messages in the RMB?

Will the prosecution Gruffyrichard and hillbillybob state their claim?

(I am the judge btw)

UNFAIR! On behalf of my client I ask that the case is prosecuted by a jury of their peers

Tocan isle wrote:

IN THE COURT OF SOLARFLARE
The issue on the table: according to the official laws of Solarflare, did Celestial wave commit a crime by suppressing two messages in the RMB?

Will the prosecution Gruffyrichard and hillbillybob state their claim?

(I am the judge btw)

Yes. In the name of free speech, and according to SF rules CW is not allowed to suppress those posts. Those posts represent my honest beliefs about Alexander Hamilton, and if CW does not agree with them then we can have a friendly debate instead of suppression.

Sierra Grand wrote:

UNFAIR! On behalf of my client I ask that the case is prosecuted by a jury of their peers

then how is that fair to me? shouldn't the case be decided by a jury of equal representation?
or should all the jurors be random people

Tocan isle wrote:

Yes, the jury should be unbiased

Therefore I nominate a jury of 3 AF Residents (GRHB/BKA Rep.) and 3 SolarFlare Reps (Tocan/CelWav)