«12. . .37383940414243. . .226227»
I've had this puppet here for quite a while, there's no need to make new ones.
That’s fine, sorry
anyway i am expressing my beliefs on hamilton why should i be suppressed for my beliefs?
who can find a reason why i should be suppressed for hating hamilton?
In fact the defendant is infringement of Article 1:
If you are having a discussion on one of these topics on the RMB please remain respectful and civil.
The defendant has not kept it civil in fact suggesting that hamilton's death was not a problem
why can i not post anti-hamilton speech? what reason does CW have to suppress?
Answer: none.
To the jury I recommend you choose
Guilty
Boi that's how the country worked in the 1800s
Verdict Rejected.
Duels may have existed, it does not justify murder
are you the juror or the judge?
if two dudes in 1800s had problems they settled it with duel and it was OK, they weren't arreste for murder
what authority does that give you to reject my verdict?
I say the evidence is unusable
The purpose of this court case is not to debate the nature of duels in 18th century America,’but to decide if CW committed a crime by suppressing posts
Which my defendant did not
your right we're getting off topic
so CW did comit the crime. unreasonable suppression of posts
your the defendant dum dum
what kind of third rate lwyer are you!
CW is the client
Ok, is there anything else of relevance that either the prosecution or defense would like to say?
«12. . .37383940414243. . .226227»
Advertisement
