«12. . .2,7542,7552,7562,7572,7582,7592,760. . .2,7742,775»
Does it count the Forum?
Your brain is glitching: https://imgur.com/rULInVF
Mine is too.
Oh hey Einsiev
RP
Anti-Internet acitivists gather in the Savraan Capitol, Lelies. Their leader Marin Karalainen speaks:
"Ladies and gentlemen, behold the consequences of our blind reliance on the digital behemoth! The extended blackout is not just a glitch; it's a wake-up call to the folly of entrusting our entire existence to the whims of the internet. Our economies crippled, our supply chains shattered, our education system in disarray—all because we put all our eggs in the digital basket. This is not progress; this is regression masked as innovation! We must reclaim our autonomy from the clutches of the internet, lest we become slaves to its whims once more. Let this be a lesson learned in the harshest of ways: the internet is a tool, not a crutch, and it's high time we remember that!"
RP
Schwarzenberg loses the Senate
During the collapse of the internet (will talk about its effects in Vantier later), Vantier had elections for its senate, and the results show that neither the left nor the right have a clear majority. The left won the election, having the most seats in the Senate, but only 8 more than the right. The party "United", the big tent populist party, won more than 70 seats, which means that they will be decisive for controlling the senate. So far, United has refused to work with the left or the right. Within the right, Schwarzenberg's more centrist liberals had by far the most votes and seats, with the conservatives losing most of their strength and doing even worse than the polls suggested. The left was expected to win an absolute majority, but the situation seems complicated for them. Even if United abstains in during any voting session, the black nationalists and fascists would be able to make everything very complicated for them. The fascists did better than expected, but they have already announced that they are unwilling to work with any establishment party that is democratic or communist, which means they will block everything they can.
The liberals actually won the election by votes, but due to the way seat distribution works in the Senate (benefits rural areas and reduces Ampuries' seats, due to "unequal population balance"), the socialists won thanks to their performance in rural areas, while they lost every major city except Westside, since they tend to be more liberal(note: NOT conservative).
Here is the seat distribution:
-Social-democratic Labour Party (centre-left): 180/480
-Comminist Party of Vantier: 13/480
Right-wing bloc: 188/480
-Liberal Party: 135/480
-National Party: 32/480
-People's Party: 21/480
Other parties:
-United: 72/480
-Fascist Party: 11/480
-Pan-African National Congress: 10/480
-Zululand Nationalist Party: 6/480
How many seats did the Liberals loose?
Not my melody, but I still arranged this
https://onlinesequencer.net/3967097
Almitruz and Hunetia dos
IC:
The backup plan worked. The nations are in chaos.
was just about to say that we arrived in Volgograd bruh
Can I have a recap?
Sjevre, Almitruz, and Hunetia dos
terrorists in Tula-Tambov -> terrorists were from UKAK -> Tula-Tambov mad and sees this as an attack -> Tula-Tambov mobilises SaSu to attack UKAK -> cities Kursk, Belgorod and Voronezh fell -> troops closed in on Volgograd -> NS broke down.
They lost around 50. The conservatives lost around 20 and the socialists won 110 or so.
RP
Constitutional change in Savranakas Suurvaltas is coming. Here there will be an additional government position that will be directly elected by the population.
There have been complaints in recent years about the form of democracy in the Savranakas Suurvaltas, where it was said that the population cannot actually choose who governs the union. This is because the parliaments of each country determine who will be the leader of the country and then represent their country in the General Committee. The chairman of the General Committee, the Chief Executive, or better known as the Secretary General, on the other hand, is elected by the Union parliament, again indirectly.
As a result, a democratization process has been initiated to invent a position that can be directly elected by the population. The position will be called Union Chancellor (UC) and will be jointly with the Secretary General, who may be transformed into Committee Chancellor (CC), part of the Chief Executive office. The two positions will be equals and can veto each other's decisions. However, there will be a clear difference in their responsibilities, but what these are is not yet clear.
The election of this Union Chancellor will proceed as follows.
(Round 1.)
- Each country or party may send one or more candidates.
- The electoral colleges are divided into four groups based on language groups. The Polish-speaking, the Savran-Uralic speaking, the Russian-speaking group and the group of remaining language communities, including Belarusian, Danish and German. All the language groups have been given the same amount of weight in the electoral process. All have been given 81 vote-points to distribute among the candidates. This gives a member from, for example Subulev Puola, with the most inhabitance, equal vote-points to get, even with lower overall votes.
- The candidate of, for example, Subulev Kirov, which belongs to the Russian-speaking group, is not allowed to participate in the Russian-speaking group in the first round.
- After this process, the three candidates who have received the highest amount of vote-points will go through the next round.
(Round 2.)
- Here anyone can vote for any candidate, regardless of what language they speak.
- If a candidate receives more than 50% of the votes here, he, they or she is automatically the Union Chancellor.
- If none of the candidates receive more than 50% the two candidates with the most votes go through to the next round.
(Round 3.)
- The same as before. The winner between the two candidates becomes the Union Chancellor.
Do y'all think that this is a good idea?
Hello to all from Ukraine
Hello
How are you?
How are you doing?
But this means that people have unequal voting rights. So you create the same problem as in the US. The Democrats pretty much always have the most votes, yet that doesn't mean the Democrat becomes president.
A bit too discriminatory and unequal for my taste. More populous countries are underrepresented. Could it work? Yes. Is it too tedious? Perhaps. I prefer the two-round system. In the first round, you have all the candidates you want + (my own creation) Legislative election. This way, you'll have a European-style Parliament. In the second round, the two parties with the most votes fight, and the winner wins the Executive. Then, to appoint the Supreme Court (Judiciary), you give the government of each province, regardless of population, the ability to appoint a single judge, and the total number of SC judges has to be uneven, so if the number of provinces are even, the most populous one gets to appoint another one to make the balance uneven.
Still, I'd like to see how your elections work in the system you propose. It will be unique and cool, certainly.
«12. . .2,7542,7552,7562,7572,7582,7592,760. . .2,7742,775»
Advertisement
