Ubalin

When there was not a single man among them to rescue the land from the nine bows. I surrounded Egypt. I established Egypt by my valiant might. When I arose like the Sun, as King over the Two Lands, I protected Egypt. I expelled from Egypt the nine bows. Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not.

Their hearts and souls are finished forever. And for those whom have assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was against them. Before the harbor mounts and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them, they were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach. Slain and made heaps from stern to bow. By law, their possessions were cast upon the waters, so they may remember Kemet in the afterlife

When they mention my name in their land, may it consume them while I sit upon the throne of Horakhty and the uraeus diadem is fixed upon my head like Ra. I permit not the countries to see the boundary of Kemet. As for the nine bows, I have taken away their land and their boundaries and they are added to mine. Their chiefs and their people come to me with praise. I carried out the plans of the All-Lord, Amun-Ra. Their just, divine father and lord of all the gods. Rejoice Ye old Kemet, to the height of heaven for I am king of the south and the north upon the throne of Atum. The Gods have appointed me to be king over Khem. To be victor, to expel foreigners from Khem. The gods decreed to me the kingdom while I was a child and my reign is full of plenty.

Strength has been given to me. Because of my benefactions to the netjeru from a heart of love. I have expelled the mourning that was in your hearts and made you dwell in peace. Those whom my hands overthrown shall not return. Their land, their desolation is a daily mention of my name, King Ramesses III. I have covered Khem. I have protected Khem by my valiant might. Since I assumed the rule of the kingdom, the might of my two arms brings terror among the nine bows. Not a land strays. They all adhere in my name. But they leave their cities, starting in their places forsaken before them.

I am a raging bull, confident in my two horns. My hand is equal to my courage, followed by valor. I am the strong and valiant one. My designs come to pass without fail. I have shown my excellence. Since I known the netjer, Amun-Ra, the father of the netjeru, I have not ignored his temples, but my heart has been steadfast to double the feast and offerings of what was done before. My heart is filled with truth and righteousness everyday. The netjeru are pleased with righteousness and truth. And their hands offer me the shield of my body, to ward off evil and misfortune from my limbs.

The King. Ruler of the Nine Bows. Lord of the Two Lands. Ramesses III, given life, stability, satisfaction, like Ra, forever.

2) Your faith in Manetho is problematic on multiple counts.

a) Yes, Manetho's Pharaoh of the Exodus is named Amenophis, but Amenophis does not die at the Red Sea. He goes into exile in Ethiopia, only to return with an army and defeat Osarseph (Moses). No mention of a sea crossing is made at all, let alone a disastrous one.

b) Manetho betrays his own ignorance by naming Seti I as Amenophis' son, and Ramses as his grandson, thus glossing over the reigns of at least four Pharaohs. He makes no mention of the Amarna heresy (except perhaps through the distorted lens of the Osarseph rebellion), nor of Tut, Ay, Horemheb, or Rameses I.

c) Manetho says Avaris was the city gifted by Pharaoh to, and rebuilt by, Moses'/Osarseph's followers. He asserts that by the time of Amenhotep, Avaris (the former Hyksos capital) had largely been abandoned. In this he manages for once to be correct, but only partially. While a naval station had been maintained in the area, the city itself was not heavily occupied. But his claim that the city enjoyed an 18th Dynasty renaissance is provably incorrect. While the city of Pi-Rameses was eventually built over the ruins of old

Avaris, this was done under the orders of Ramses II, not Amenhotep. The Bible tells us Pharaoh ordered the Israelites to build "store cities". Pi-Rameses was exactly that -- a city built as a logistical base for his campaigns in the Levant.
Taking into account Manetho's confusion of the late 18th and early 19th Dynasty chronologies, and the very same mention of "The City of Ramses" in the Bible, once again, a mid 13th century date for the purported Exodus is far more defensible archaeologically and historically.

3) Regarding the similarities between Israelite and Atenist theology. . .There are none, not beyond a surface gloss at least. . .Israelite monotheism was an Iron Age invention, not a late Bronze Age one. Thus while it is possible the religion of the Israelites drew some inspiration from the Amarna heresy, the reverse is chronologically impossible.

The Bible itself makes it abundantly obvious that those who followed Moses out of Egypt worshipped multiple deities, not just Yahweh, including, but not limited to El, Baal, and Asherah. To return to our dear, oft misguided friend Manetho, he clearly draws a relationship between the Hyksos and the later followers of Moses. If he is at all correct, then the source of early Israelite monolatrism was in the Set/Baal cult founded by the Hyksos, and interestingly enough, based in the city of Avaris.

If Akhenaten were the Pharaoh of the Exodus, and as you claim motivated in his change of religion by the awesome power of Moses' god(s), the question begs to be asked: which god? El? Baal? Yahweh? None of them bear the slightest resemblance to the Aten. Not in form, nor in function. Yahweh and Baal were functionally storm gods, deities of the wilderness, mountains, and of chaos. Aten was quite literally the Sun, a god of order and civilization. If the Pharaoh of the Exodus was so impressed by the power of Moses' religion, the Aten makes for an odd and illogical choice.

4) Finally, I'll address just a bit of your argument regarding dating.
Using the supposed fall of Jericho, or any timeline for the Israelite conquest of Canaan, as a yardstick to establish your chronology is a fool's errand. Historically and archaeologically, there is quite simply ZERO evidence for a conquest.

What evidence we do have for the existence of an early Israel again points to the late 13th century. NOT the 14th. This poses problems for your theory in particular, and any other that tries to draw parallels between the Exodus and the Amarna period. Armies under Horemheb, Seti, and Ramses II fought their way up and down the Levant throughout the late 14th and early 13th Centuries B.C.. Where was the formidable army of Joshua to oppose them? Why does the Bible itself fail to mention these campaigns?

If Israel had already left Egypt by the mid 14th century, Joshua should have been rampaging through Canaan right around the time Seti and Ramses II were campaigning there. Arguably, several Canaanite city states should already have been under Israelite control. Yet it isn't until 1208 B.C., under Ramses' successor Merneptah, that we get the first mention of Israel.

The Mereneptah Stele is the earliest attestation we have, and it clearly refers to Israel as a people, not a place. Thus in 1208, according to the only archaeological source we have, the Israelites were still on the move. Interestingly enough, that 1208 date does, just barely, fit within a chronology that sets the Exodus during the 1250's. What it does not do is support an earlier date for the Exodus.

I could go on, but this is too long already. So to conclude, playing mathematical semantics with dating systems and biblical claims may be entertaining, it is not an exact science. Perhaps if your calculations jived well with the rest of the historical, archaeological, and theological context, they might hold some weight. But quite simply, the theological evidence does not support any connection between Atenism and the early religion of the Israelites. The textual evidence repeatedly suggests a 19th Dynasty date for the origin of the Exodus story. And the archaeological evidence supports the same. IF there was an Exodus, and that is a VERY big "if", it occurred early in the 19th Dynasty, probably during the reign of Ramses II.