by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .29,31329,31429,31529,316

Arctic Lands wrote:Speak Russian? Or hail technology for breaking language barriers?

We had it good back in the day when we had one language for the elites like Latin while the common people do not speak back and have no need for language

Syndicasia wrote:for now, the latter
if i do have the time and frame of mind to learn Russian, i will ask for the former

I'll send the link to ya. But translate it yourself.

36%
1: big
2: war
3: communist

Tomato Lands wrote:36%
1: big
2: war
3: communist

USSR? (red flag necessarily means genuinely communist /s)

Arctic Lands wrote:USSR? (red flag necessarily means genuinely communist /s)

present day dingus

Syndicasia wrote:all my homies are dialectical

All the most tedious commies are dialectical

Mad Jack Is Rejected wrote:All the most tedious commies are dialectical

That means all the most interesting "commies" aren't commies at all. Or does it?

Actually, no. Your statement doesn't exclude interesting commies from being dialectical :P

And when we divide commies into tedious and interesting and examine contradictions between them, WE DO DIALECTICS. Insane, right?

Tomato Lands wrote:36%
1: big
2: war
3: communist

China is big, china has declared war, china is (NOT) communist, so China I guess

In my EU4 multi-player I'm currently culture converting all of Indonesia to Latvian

Falangist Quebec wrote:In my EU4 multi-player I'm currently culture converting all of Indonesia to Latvian

Remembered Estonia vs Indonesia video

https://youtu.be/RBQ0WToKvQ4?si=zo5FmFCrDw586BdK

New goal:
To have the lowest lifespan in TRR

I wonder why nations with lifespans below 20 even have their populations on the increase. There must be families with a ton of children since most of those die early anyway.

Arctic Lands wrote:That means all the most interesting "commies" aren't commies at all. Or does it?

Actually, no. Your statement doesn't exclude interesting commies from being dialectical :P

And when we divide commies into tedious and interesting and examine contradictions between them, WE DO DIALECTICS. Insane, right?

This was very tedious smh.

«12. . .29,31329,31429,31529,316

Advertisement