The PacificBoard

Novoblupolia wrote:

I said invade, not attempt to start a nuclear war. and then immediately get couped by Thomas

A coup wouldn't stop the nukes.

The Bandit State wrote:

A coup wouldn't stop the nukes.

He'd get couped the moment he'd be inagurated. Not to mention, launching nukes requires both Prime Minister's and Supreme Marshall's consent.

Novoblupolia wrote:

He'd get couped the moment he'd be inagurated. Not to mention, launching nukes requires both Prime Minister's and Supreme Marshall's consent.

Not your nukes. Other people's nukes.

A small question;
Do newly created nations start in the Pacific or a sub-region of it?
I'm asking this because a past-nation I made also started in the Pacific, just wanting to see if that's true, for no other reason than why not.

The Bandit State wrote:

Not your nukes. Other people's nukes.

Kathol rift wrote:

Poor choice of words, as those that invade generally aren't in their right mind. They can still be very formidable opponents, though. So rather than dodging the question, why don't you answer it?

I'd rely on my advanced technology, my bunkers and the peacekeeper forces, as well as international pressure.

Now then, should I head over to HaS, Strala, NDR and Jar and tell them that you guys are questioning their abilities to defend their faction members?

Honourbound wrote:

A small question;
Do newly created nations start in the Pacific or a sub-region of it?
I'm asking this because a past-nation I made also started in the Pacific, just wanting to see if that's true, for no other reason than why not.

All new nations start in either

The North Pacific
the South Pacific
The East Pacific
Land of Horror the West Pacific
And finally, this old place

Novoblupolia wrote:

I'd rely on my advanced technology, my bunkers and the peacekeeper forces, as well as international pressure.

Now then, should I head over to HaS, Strala, NDR and Jar and tell them that you guys are questioning their abilities to defend their faction members?

Feel free. I'm questioning your ideology, not their ability. So far, all I've learned is that your ideology is to hide behind others so you can lord your peacefulness over everyone else.

Novoblupolia wrote:

As Mohandas Gandhi once said: "There's nothing wrong with deterrence - having a weapon is very different from actually using it."

Also Gandhi: "Our words are backed with NUCLEAR WEAPONS."

Cermiersia wrote:

All new nations start in either

The North Pacific
the South Pacific
The East Pacific
Land of Horror the West Pacific
And finally, this old place

Land of Horror doesn't exist.

Cermiersia wrote:

All new nations start in either

The North Pacific
the South Pacific
The East Pacific
Land of Horror the West Pacific
And finally, this old place

Basically:
-East, the rejected cousin
-North, huge RMB
-South, friendly
-West, basically the description of East
And us.

Cermiersia wrote:

All new nations start in either

The North Pacific
the South Pacific
The East Pacific
Land of Horror the West Pacific
And finally, this old place

Penguinya wrote:

Basically:
-East, the rejected cousin
-North, huge RMB
-South, friendly
-West, basically the description of East
And us.

West and East are both cool in their own ways, but don't put them in the same room together.

Novoblupolia wrote:

Novoblupolia is a nation to which people fled from the war, our ideology is focused on avoiding ever engaging in wars, and iif relying on other nations for defense is something you consider bad - go tell that to Lichtenstein. I prefer relying on superpowers in exchange for supplying them economically rather than breaking the promises of peace made to my nation by it's founders.

You see, that's where we differ. Kathols will die for others without question or thought of reward. Your people will allow others to die for them, simply so they can say that they stayed out of a war. Your ideology contradicts itself there.