The North PacificBoard

Should Forest Doggos have rights?
The debate has sparked between civil rights activists and leaders of more traditionalist territories.

BY BORK-BORK WOOF

Lots of borks have been launched about forest doggos ["wolves" for the hoomans]: the wild, savage, estranged, primitive doggos. The majority of the borks have been northern parts of the Confederacy, especially the Husky District. A majority of the doggos in the Husky Territory, who are often confused with the forest doggos, are in majority against rights for their more primitive counterparts. The leader of the Husky Territory, Woof-Nom the Second says that "when forest doggos are domesticated, they become a large expense [to the government]." In the same territory, from a domesticated line of forest doggos, Bork-Bork-Bork says that "They [forest doggos] share the canid species with regular doggos, and even alternative forest doggos [which hoomans know as "foxes"], are equal to the other doggos." Bork-Bork-Bork, leader of the Forest Doggos for Inalienable Rights, or FDIR, are planning a major bork outside the Capitol in the Governmental District. As events turn out, The Canidstan Leader will update you with more news.

Image from nps.gov