The Union of Rightwing NationsBoard

United carolinas republic wrote:

sweden is not socialist. The government doesnt own the businesses, the pentions are privaticed, same with healthcare and 1/3 of schools

I said that they're socialist through welfare. My entire argument was literally about socialist welfare. The only citizens deserving welfare are the disabled who can't work, not lazy people who choose to remain poor. If the government gives them money, who says they'll buy food with it? Who knows, maybe they could end up buying drugs with it. That situation is defined as the government literally helping citizens ruin their own lives.

Sweden is socialist through welfare and Capitalist through free-markets. It's called mixed economics. The welfare part, I despise. The free-markets part, though, I like. I just think Sweden is very left-leaning because of their high populations of Liberals that drown out the populations of Conservatives, and many non-Conservative stances on many different things as well, which I no longer have time to specify on due to the fact that my online classes will start shortly.

Also, is English your L2? I'm wondering based off of your spelling. It's either you're bilingual (sign of intelligence), but still learning, or you're a 12-year old politically-brainwashed kid who still doesn't know how to spell.

they only can afford the welfare because of how open their market is and how little rules there are so more people can earn money and pay taxes. the swedish government also tax the poor 60% so dont pretend its some paradise over there

United corporate states wrote:

yeah but china is kinda mixed when it comes to their economy

"State Capitalism" sure is a funny way of saying Communism

Anamonta wrote:

"State Capitalism" sure is a funny way of saying Communism

no its not capitalism more like crony capitalism

United carolinas republic wrote:

well just because they have good welfare doesnt make them socialism

America and Canada have a substantial amount of welfare nets.
Would you call them Socialist economies? No.

United corporate states wrote:

the "X scandinavian country is socialist" argument is such bs at this point none of them would call them self's socialist.

North American Left and European Left are two very different things, it's a travesty to even compare them.

Hey guy's what's up I know I seem like a left-wing nation when I say Democratic Republic, but I'm more focused on the economy and the right to bear arms, etc then to suppress my citizens like Communism, Socialism, and Fazism. I have opinions like the Libertarian Party. Anyways just wanted to say hi, that's all!

North sonovia wrote:

I said that they're socialist through welfare. My entire argument was literally about socialist welfare. The only citizens deserving welfare are the disabled who can't work, not lazy people who choose to remain poor. If the government gives them money, who says they'll buy food with it? Who knows, maybe they could end up buying drugs with it. That situation is defined as the government literally helping citizens ruin their own lives.

Sweden is socialist through welfare and Capitalist through free-markets. It's called mixed economics. The welfare part, I despise. The free-markets part, though, I like. I just think Sweden is very left-leaning because of their high populations of Liberals that drown out the populations of Conservatives, and many non-Conservative stances on many different things as well, which I no longer have time to specify on due to the fact that my online classes will start shortly.

Also, is English your L2? I'm wondering based off of your spelling. It's either you're bilingual (sign of intelligence), but still learning, or you're a 12-year old politically-brainwashed kid who still doesn't know how to spell.

You have a helluva a lot more valid point than most people, when you say "mixed economics" yes I understand that Sweden is a left-leaning nation and has some socialist policies I really hate in terms of welfare at least. I think Austria's like that too I don't know If I'm being honest. Having an open-market economy is very good because not only can citizens make money and help themselves prosper,(If they are not drug addicts) but also contribute to the economy and help them not go into National Debt like: Ahem United States of America.

United carolinas republic wrote:

dude I'm a 14 year old that is learning about economics, getting into forex and btw petions IS part of welfare. No need to just insult people because you disagree with them. Im not gonna use perfect grammar and spelling in the rp forum that I dont rlly give 2 craps about

If you don't give "two craps" about this place, then leave and don't come back, because coming back would mean you care about this place.

United carolinas republic wrote:

i dont get why someone from a right wing region would even show a lil mercy to socialism

It's called civil discourse. I agree with some but not the majority of forms of welfare. Civil discourse is showing mercy and trying to be fair. Uncivil discourse is just a bunch of people trying to yell over each other to win a debate.

United carolinas republic wrote:

commies = stupid B)))))

Professionally, I beg to differ. Personally, I couldn't agree more. And I do wish I could.

Asian islands wrote:

What the f*ck happened while I was gone

Everything happened that's all some argument between mixed economics and such. For once in my life I agree with somebody, which is the leader of the region.

why is the patriarchy holdin her down if is her decision not to work in the sewers

North autrion wrote:

Everything happened that's all some argument between mixed economics and such. For once in my life I agree with somebody, which is the leader of the region.

Why I'm just the WA delegate. But I'm flattered :)

Asian islands wrote:

Some lady told me she didn't want to work in the sewer and I just shook my head and told her, "Don't let the patriarchy hold you down."

Epic.

Xavier The 1 wrote:

why is the patriarchy holdin her down if is her decision not to work in the sewers

He meant because [some] women sometimes claim that the patriarchy prevents us from getting jobs/working, and even when we do get jobs, we don't get paid equally. It's up for you to decide to believe if it's a myth or a fact.