Vote Against SC resolution Commend Gay

[background-block=#265780][hr][center][floatleft][img]http://z2.ifrm.com/10711/28/0/p1090384/tnp_header.png[/img][/floatleft][size=200][color=#dfecff]Security Council Vote Recommendation[/color][/size][/center][hr][center][b][size=125] [/size][color=#dfecff]Part of the[/color] [url=/page=dispatch/id=724191][color=#94c248]Information for WA Voters[/color][/url] [color=#dfecff]program[/color][size=125] [/size][/b][/center][hr][/background-block]
[box][size=150][color=#265780]Resolution at Vote: [url=/page=sc]Commend Gay[/url][/color][/size]
[size=150][color=#265780]Vote Recommendation:[/color] [b]Against[/b][/size][/box]

[size=150][color=#265780]Resolution Analysis[/color][/size]
This resolution represents Gay as a region that promotes equality for all members of the LGBTQ+ community. However, this is not necessarily true in all scenarios. Gay does not allow LGBTQ+ members to participate in the government if they are raiders, and even if they stop playing this role they are not treated the same as other members. Gay stated during a previous commendation attempt in January 2016 that they would eliminate all barriers to those who do not share their strict defender ideology. That did not happen, as checked on their Constitution, among other sources. Although Gay's purpose is certainly commendable, their failure (or little interest) in executing it is not.

[b]For these reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote [u]against[/u] the resolution.[/b]

[size=150][color=#265780][url=http://forum.thenorthpacific.org/topic/9074452/]Join our discussion![/url][/color][/size]
[background-block=#265780][hr][center][img]http://b2.ifrm.com/10711/28/0/p3023064/tnp_wa_voting_footer.png[/img]
[b][color=#dfecff]Sponsored by the[/color] [url=http://forum.thenorthpacific.org/forum/39609/][color=#94c248]Ministry of World Assembly Affairs[/color][/url] [color=#dfecff]of The North Pacific.[/color][/b][/center][hr][/background-block]